Everything has grown over the past century, from cars to roads to waistlines. But most of all, our homes have reached cartoonish proportions, despite the fact that the number of people per house has fallen. Think of the “McMansions” that have paved over the countryside. Yet building, heating and maintaining our homes accounts for anywhere from 30 to 40 percent of our energy and materials usage.
Do we really need such big houses? What is the point in spending up to two-thirds of our income on homes we never get to spend much time in because we’re working (and commuting to work) to pay for them? Wouldn’t it be nice to free up some of our time, energy, and creativity—and use fewer of the planet’s precious resources at the same time—by living small? The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation estimates that for each reduction of 100 square feet in home size, we would save 590 kg of CO2 per year.
A new generation of designers and architects are thinking small and proving that size doesn’t always matter. Instead, with sleek, original, quirky and comfy designs, they’re showing that it’s really what you do with it that counts.
Photo Credit: Ivan Brodey
-
Some CFLs are crappy; I've used some that turn on (instantly -- a the flip of the switch) at ...Anonymous3 hours 16 min ago
-
The question is not only WHAT to give but how to wrap it. I've been using cloth gift bags for ...M M3 hours 37 min ago
-
Want to eat a 100-FOOT diet, rather than a 100-Mile one? Grow your own food! There's a new ...M M3 hours 42 min ago
-
For books and DVDs about living sustainably, published by a small, Canadian, off-grid publisher, ...M M3 hours 47 min ago
-
I live off the grid and constantly have people tell me that they are going to put up a few solar ...M M3 hours 53 min ago
















Comments
Post new comment