From Scandinavia with Love

Photo: Flickr.com/comcaspermoller
Our northern neighbours winter just as hard as we do but use a fraction of the energy. What's their secret to green living?

Canadians have a lot in common with the Scandinavian countries—not least, a similar population and those long, frigid winters. But when it comes to sustainable living, our northern neighbours have us beat, hands down.

For many Scandinavians, an eco-conscious approach to living is merely a way of life.  “We have a different view of nature…we’re more respectful,” says Sofie Adolfsson Jörby, a Swede who works as environmental coordinator within Sweden’s Ministry of the Environment. Currently working out of the municipal offices of the Halifax Regional Municipality as part of an international work exchange program, Adolfsson Jörby says that for most Scandinavians, an eco-conscious attitude is learned beginning in early childhood.  

Whatever the reason, here are a few areas in which they’re outshining Canadians on sustainability. Maybe it’s time we imported more than just the Scandinavian design ethos and easy-to-assemble furniture.

Living energy light

According to a recent national poll in Sweden, 78 percent of the population reported reducing their daily energy consumption last year. Energy consciousness is fostered in part through the widespread use of efficient appliances and well-insulated homes, among other initiatives. For example, recent regulations in Sweden even restrict the amount of energy new homes may use, limiting it to 110 kilowatt hours per square meter per year (and many use far less than that!).

Heating smart

When it comes to home heating, Scandinavians have shed their reliance on oil in favour of more renewable energy sources such as wind, biofuel, and geothermal, as well as district heating, whereby heat is distributed to multiple homes through a network of pipes (usually underground) run from a single generating plant. Many of those plants are designed to run on everything from municipal solid waste (one such plant in Stockholm processes 25 percent of all of Sweden’s garbage) to palm oil and wood pellets. So, it’s no surprise to find that Sweden, for example, generates far less greenhouse gas than Canada: 5.32 tonnes compared to our 16.52 tonnes per capita in 2006. What’s more, Adolfsson Jörby points out that those numbers take into account the fact that many Scandinavian countries have just as much heavy industry as Canada does.

Getting around

Scandinavian cities are often more densely populated than Canadian cities are, making them easier to navigate by foot or bicycle, and making public transit—including trains and buses that run on biofuel—a more efficient option. In Copenhagen, for example, cyclists have their own bike lanes – even their own traffic signals. And more than 150,000 people enter the city centre by bicycle every year.

In both Denmark and Norway, commuters and tourists alike can take advantage of the CityBike program – a network of bicycles (there are 1,300 in Copenhagen alone) that are available on free, short-term loans from hubs interspaced through urban centres. (Montreal introduced a similar public bike program last year —a first in Canada. By this spring, the Bixi network, as it’s called, expects to have 3000 bikes stationed at 300 locations.)

To discourage unnecessary traffic in the city centre, some cities, such as Oslo, charge a toll to drive into downtown core.

Saving trees

Scandinavian countries are also forest-rich like Canada, but they maintain a more environmentally sensitive approach to maintaining this valuable natural resource. For more than 100 years, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden have had forestry legislation in place that limits the amount of timber that can be harvested at one time. “And if you clear-cut an area, then you have to replant it,” explains Adolfsson Jörby, the money for which must be set aside before the cutting begins. Since implementing this legislation, the forest resources in Scandinavian countries have doubled.

For Scandinavians, taking an educated, eco-conscious and energy-efficient approach to life seems to be second nature! It’s a green lesson that should have Canadians green with envy.  


Comments

Brilliant! When can we see it start to roll out? Can it start small, or must it necessarily be a big system, the way call phone systems are? I am interested to hear about further developments. Good luck, Ted
We have an energy saving idea that cuts car usage in half. It uses a combination of ride sharing and GPS.We are not trying to sell this idea but to promote it as a earth saving one. Robert & Lynne Joseph The GPS Solution It is a fact that there are far too many vehicles on the road today. The result is traffic jams, accidents, and worst of all, pollution and wasted gas. Another little known fact is if three or more people are in an average car, it can be the most energy efficient mode of transportation per person/mile traveled. The customer, both driver and passenger communicates wirelessly with a computer through a form of G.P.S enabled device with mapping capability. Cell phone capability may be employed but is not essential. There are GPS systems available from many companies and many cell phones and cars already have GPS capability. Now, let’s take this idea and add it to the idea of “Car Pooling.” Some individuals already take advantage of this form of transportation to save on gas, to share expenses or to save on the stress of having to drive for hours every day. Car pooling is very inefficient though as you must find the person to pick up. You often need to go far out of your way. Car Pooling currently works best when you are traveling longer distances. The passenger inputs a destination and the fact that he is ready to leave in a GPS enabled devise plus his security code to verify who he is. His system is connected to a central computer. A driver with a car enabled GPS devise who is signed in to the system and who is going to the node in the passengers path is directed by his G.P.S. devise to that person’s location. A node is a transfer point or hub and it is an intermediary way point on a person’s journey. He then proceeds to the node, possibly picking up others as he goes. At the nearest node, all passengers get out and are directed by their GPS to a car going toward their final destination. He passes through nodes until he reaches his destination .The computer will calculate easily a efficient route with few transfers. Small towns may have a few nodes, mostly on major roads out of town. Major cities would have hundreds. Nodes would be located by major roads, bus, train, subways and transport interlinks. In major cities most on road parking would be replaced by nodes greatly reducing available parking and greatly increasing the incentive to leave your car at home but picking up and dropping off people very convenient. Remaining parking would be available to people who participate. As the central computer knows who it sent with whom, it can charge passengers and credit drivers. Security can be assured by the fact that it knows who is traveling with whom. Passengers pay through a Pay Pal type of system which is integral to it. They are charged by the computer for mileage. A stolen GPS can’t be signed in unless the thief has its pin number. Buses and Trains, taxis can all participate. Since bus and train stations are nodes they can easily participate and be paid by the system, no ticket or cash required. Taxis could pick up multiple passengers. No carrying cash or worrying about being paid. How many small towns have no transit system at all? Since only around 55% of people currently drive I can see this system being to great benefit to almost everyone. For further information contact Robert and Belinda Joseph 21 Trillium Way Paris Ontario N3L3P9 519-442-1466 or e mail us at whoisit99ca@yahoo.ca ALL RIGHTS RESERVED COPYRIGHT BY ROBERT AND BELINDA JOSEPH 2008
I have been to Sweden and I was impressed with their lifestyle. Their city streets are very clean and the people are super friendly. I agree with aspects of the article by Meredith Dault talking about the Scandinavian way. I don't understand why our Canadian Government cannot copy the green living attitude and learn from them. I know different political parties have visited other countries on fact-finding missions in the past 5 years but I don't see any change. They talk in the media about how fascinating their findings are, well, talk is cheap I want to see change implemented in my life time so my children can benefit from this more than I. I wish I could move to another country where living would be healthier but it is not in the cards.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.