The Climate Change Mythbuster

Photo: iStockphoto.com/peepo
PR expert Jim Hoggan tirelessly combats lies about global warming—and the PR machine working to spread them

"I am stunned—absolutely stunned," says Jim Hoggan, author of the new book Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming (Greystone Books) and a chair of the David Suzuki Foundation.


He's not shocked by how climate change deniers managed to stall global awareness and action on global warming—though many people are. He's shocked that the people who deny the very existence of climate change are actually still around, and amazed that there is even the need for his book, which outlines their lies and the PR machine that drives them.


If anybody is in a position to understand how the art of public relations has furthered the cause of global warming denialists, he should: As president of the PR firm Hoggan & Associates in Vancouver, he has worked in the field for decades. “Public relations is about fostering relationships and helping people communicate—not about spreading misinformation,” he says.


Offended and incensed by the way oil and coal companies hired PR firms from the 1980s onwards to manufacture doubt about the reality of global warming (just as they did to spread uncertainty about the hazards of second-hand smoke and a litany of other scientifically solid issues), he founded an online resource, DeSmogBlog.com, five years ago.


“When we started it, a small blog run out of a closet in Vancouver, I never thought we would have 1.3 million visitors by now,” he says—nor did he think the blog would still be in existence.

Denialist boom

In fact, Hoggan says, not only are the deniers still around, “they seem to be on the increase.” As the public grows more aware of the unshakeable strength of the scientific consensus and the urgency of the problem, so does the desperation and the stubbornness of those determined to deny its importance for the sake of big money. “This isn't a conspiracy—it's an industry,” he says.


In the late 1980s, Hoggan writes in the Climate Cover-Up, the recognition of climate change and of man-made greenhouse gases as the primary cause was so accepted that even George Bush Sr., said “Those who think we are powerless to do anything about the greenhouse effect forget about the 'White House effect': as president I intend to do something about it.”


But 20 years of oil companies (plus their hired PR guns) manufacturing doubt with “phony scientists, phony scientific reports, phony grassroots organizations and phony think tanks putting out press releases and press kits with the objective of undermining any effort by political bodies to put legislation in place to reduce greenhouse gases” means that we really, haven't done anything about the problem.


Greenhouse gases continue to rise (Canada is now roughly 30 percent above its 1990 levels, when it should have made cuts), public awareness continues to stagnate (a recent Gallup poll estimated that 48 percent of Americans think the threat of global warming is exaggerated), political movements are slowed (the B.C. carbon tax was notoriously rejected, “when people should have been crying out for a carbon tax,” Hoggan says; it has since been implemented) and the media continues to quote global warming skeptics in the same space as bona fide climate change scientists. Most notoriously, he writes, The Calgary Herald.

Changing tactics

With the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (along with Al Gore) winning the Nobel Prize and the upcoming UN meeting in Copenhagen on everybody's radar, outright denial of the existence of climate change is becoming less and less commonplace. But in that place, he says, we are now seeing more and more “energy” and “environmental”

experts saying that it is indeed a problem and it is indeed our fault, but that it would be too costly to prevent. Other problems, such as AIDS or poverty, rank higher on our priority list, and we can't possibly deal with climate change at the same time, they argue.


“They give people the sense that it's not something they can do anything about—it's a very clever strategy,” Hoggan says.


Media-friendly figures like Britain's Christopher Monckton (featured on CBC's The Hour) and Bjorn Lomborg (graced with a TED talk) continue to find megaphones for their views that climate change is just too big a problem for us to fix, “without ever being asked where they get their money from,” he says.

Reason to hope

But, he adds, “The number of people who understand the problem and who are concerned grows by the day.”


“I really feel my job is to help improve the way that we talk about [climate change] to people so that they can understand it better—to help shed light on those people who are just trying to confuse the public,” says Hoggan. “I think that is something that I will spend the rest of my life on.”

Comments

It is mind blowing to think that in a small forum like a blog, people are still split on whether or not global warm does or does not exist. Also, this website is geared towards PR and global warm, why are people who so passionate to search out this type of information and disprove it anyway they can unless they have an ulterior motive. Can we really dismiss visible and available information such as pictures from space of Greenland’s ice cap or the Antarctica or the Northwest Passage opening in Northern Canada? Rather than focusing on the small amount of bad information gather by a few scientists and dismiss the whole argument, why not focus on creditable proven information.
Only uneducated people submit to name calling.
I suggest the 'global warming deniers' go wrap their mouths around some tailpipes for a few minutes and tell us all how 'ecological' that feels. I supposed I am somewhat saddened by your ignorance and willful stupidity, but I accept that this is always the way. There were many, many white people who thought black people should be kept separate. There were many, many men who thought women were too stupid to do things like vote and control their own lives. There were many, many people who thought being gay was some kind of crime. And so there are many, many people who don't wish to consider the destruction of the planet, the link between poisoning our environment and giving ourselves cancer, and the fundamental injustice that fuels the global economic system and maintains insane wealth for a small few and extreme hardship for the vast majority. These are all stupid, ignorant people, who lead sad, hateful lives, motivated by poor, baseless values. I can only hope we can keep educating, keep learning, so that the only ears listening to these poor fools are their own.
Dan, although most skeptics would disagree on the exact chemistry behind some of your points, in general, I think they would agree with you. As the skeptic from 19:37 last night, I can tell you that I've thought that coal mining is fricking medieval for about 30 years (i.e. before the AGW "hyopthesis" really got going). The problem with the CO2 propaganda is that your people who "are trying to genuinely SAVE the world" are being given fraudulent data. The conclusion they come to regarding how they should save it, therefore, is by definition incorrect. Keep an eye out for how carbon taxation is being used to mitigate carbon pollution and how much is being used to prop up failed and failing political ideologies, and see if the carbon management leadership is actually really interested in carbon management.
I'm sorry but even if you are opposed to the idea of global warming,it is still downright stupid to believe that burning carbon the way we do is fine. Does that also mean you deny the link between acid rain and our carbon emissions? How about increased risk of lung cancer in city areas? How about the limited supply? There is no vaild argument to the continuation of burning oil and people who blast climate change and defend oil companies are doing no good for humanity. (unless making oil companies richer is your definition of a better world) So whether you disagree with climate change or not, I hope you have the sense to at least see that these people are trying to genuinely SAVE the world, while I doubt you cannot say that to someone in oil.
Hey Will, I left my real name, so now are you going to listen? The only ones who are still pushing the Global Warming agenda are those who have an agenda of their own, How are the polar bears doing Will? How about the average temperature over the last 36 years? How about the fact that climate change would not be any different if there were not a single person on the earth? Sorry Will, you've hitched your wagon to a dead horse, not that we think you're evil Will, we just know you're wrong. ==
Total garbage. This is not the 1980s Mr Rip van Hoggan. Time you woke up. Show us some proof that oil companies are paying for climate change denial in 2009. There isn't any, because they're paying for the opposite - carbon management. As one example: http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=9030052&contentId=... Another example: I worked on a cellulosic bioethanol project at a biotechnology company funded by another large oil company. I know firsthand of which I speak. The climate change skeptics of which I am one, are skeptical because the models used to promote AGW have turned out to be false and based on scientific fraud (hockey stick graph fraud, tree ring fraud, CO2 half-life fraud, Antarctic temperature reporting fraud). Skeptics are not skeptics because they are being paid to be skeptics. It's because they are incensed by the scientific fraud, the global rule, socialist political agenda driving the fraud, and the 3rd or 4th rate science masquerading as real science. They're also pretty damned fed up of articles like this (and pictures of fricking polar bears on ice floes, their natural habitat). Google Cryosphere today and look at the Antarctic ice images. Google Briffa and fraud.
You're kidding right? So convinced are you that you're brave enough to leave your real name? Oh, no, you're not! A whole article dedicated to showing the real suckers are the ones still NOT buying it and that's your contribution? Got any facts, figures? Just Hot Air, huh? Next time leave your name - maybe someone will take you seriously.
Total garbage!!! Anthropogenic Global Warming is the REAL myth, and has been thoroughly busted. When are people going to wake up and smell the green propaganda??? The ridiculous solutions to this non-existent threat stand to cause infinitely more hurt than a warming planet ever could. And, a warming planet (and also a cooling planet) is completely natural.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Copyright © 2010 of Green Living Enterprises, a division of Key Publishers Company Ltd. All rights reserved.

Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. GREEN LIVING is a trade-mark of Key Publishers Company Ltd.