http://www.greenlivingonline.com/Family/12-ways-to-protect-yourself-against-bpa-chemicals-in-plastics/
(Nov 19, 2007)
Bisphenol A (BPA) has been in the news a lot these days. But is it really a health risk? According to leading scientists we should be worried. 
What it is
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a central component in polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. This chemical has been used for decades in the linings of canned foods, in plastic and baby bottles, in polymers of some dental fillings and in other plastic products. Now an expert scientific panel has warned that unsafe levels of BPA, leaching into our canned foods and bottled drinks, pose a significant health hazard.
What it does
Bisphenol A is a class of chemicals known as endocrine-disruptors, mimicking the naturally occurring hormone estrogen. These chemicals can duplicate, block or exaggerate hormonal responses that control development of the brain, the reproductive system and other functions.
Why it's a concern
The recent scientific assessment of BPA was sponsored by the U.S. National Institute of Environment Health Sciences and published in the Summer 2007 Journal Reproductive Toxicology. The lead author of the panel, Frederick vom Saal, is a biologist at the University of Missouri and one of the world's top authorities on BPA. The assessment was signed by 37 other leading experts on BPA.
These experts stated that BPA is capable of altering the normal functioning of genes, turning them on and off at inappropriate times. They believe exposure leads to changes in the prostate, testes, mammary glands, brain structure and behaviour of laboratory animals, and "is a great cause for concern with regards to the potential for similar adverse effects in humans"
In fact, the assessment panel warned that BPA may be linked to the contemporary increases in breast cancer, prostate cancer, Type 2 diabetes, early onset of puberty in girls, obesity, and neuro-behavioural problems such as attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders.
Manufacturers weigh in
The plastics industry as argued for years that the levels of BPA that leach into canned foods and bottled drinks are safe. Their Bisphenol website states: "BPA has been safely used in consumer products and researched and studied for over 40 years. The weight of scientific evidence clearly supports the safety of BPA and provides strong reassurances that there is no basis for human health concerns from exposure to BPA."
Consider the source
But in 2005, Frederick vom Saal published a paper showing that 100 percent of the industry-funded studies (11 in all) found no harmful effects from BPA, while 90 percent of government-funded low-dose studies (104 in all) found harmful effects from BPA. According to vom Saal, "Among people who have actually read this [scientific] literature, there is no debate, just an illusion of controversy. This is a phenomenally potent chemical."
Over-exposure the issue
Part of the problem is that so many products contain BPA (everything from the lining in all our canned good, plastic bottles, CDs to auto parts and computers) that virtually everybody in developed countries has chronic exposure to the chemical. According to the recent assessment, human exposures are above the U.S. safety level, a level based on 1980s toxicity studies that considered only high-dose exposures, not chronic low-dose exposure.
An interesting test
The Environmental Working Group contracted an analytical laboratory to test 97 cans purchased in three major supermarket chains throughout southern U.S. Foods tested were those most commonly consumed by women of child bearing years: soda, canned tuna, peaches, pineapples, green beans, corn, and tomato and chicken noodle soups along with canned infant formula. The lab detected BPA in fifty-seven percent of all cans.
Health agencies slow to act
In May 2007, regulators for Health Canada and Environment Canada are assessing BPA, a process that could take up to five years. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has asked the National Academies of Science to begin an updated assessment shortly on bisphenol A, which could take years.
Protect you and your family
In the meantime, there are steps that we can take immediately to lessen our exposure to BPA:Use a metal or glass water bottle Limit your use of canned goods or choose canned foods from makers who don't use it, such as Eden Foods Learn how to cook your own foods that you typically buy in cans -- like beans or chickpeas Choose soups, milk and soy milk packaged in cardboard "brick" cartons, by Tetra Pak and SIG Combibloc, with safer layers of aluminum and polyethylene (#2) that can also be recycled Use glass food storage containers instead of plastic Use glass baby bottles or plastic bag inserts made of polyethyelene, or switch to non-clear polypropylene bottles that are labeled #5. Don't buy canned infant formula. Eat fresh foods in season to reduce your consumption of canned goods Buy or can your own foods in safe glass jars Stop using plastic wrap and plastic containers to heat food in microwaves. Ceramic and glass are better. Throw out any old and scratched plastic bottles or plastic containers Buy organic wine since many commercial wines can have up to six times the amount of BPA than canned goods Let your grocer store know you want BPA free cans and are boycotting those products with BPA in them. Joyce Nelson is an environmental journalist based in Toronto.
12 protective steps for the dangers of BPA poisoning

Image: istockphoto.com/: Dmitriy Rytikov
What it is
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a central component in polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. This chemical has been used for decades in the linings of canned foods, in plastic and baby bottles, in polymers of some dental fillings and in other plastic products. Now an expert scientific panel has warned that unsafe levels of BPA, leaching into our canned foods and bottled drinks, pose a significant health hazard.
What it does
Bisphenol A is a class of chemicals known as endocrine-disruptors, mimicking the naturally occurring hormone estrogen. These chemicals can duplicate, block or exaggerate hormonal responses that control development of the brain, the reproductive system and other functions.
Why it's a concern
The recent scientific assessment of BPA was sponsored by the U.S. National Institute of Environment Health Sciences and published in the Summer 2007 Journal Reproductive Toxicology. The lead author of the panel, Frederick vom Saal, is a biologist at the University of Missouri and one of the world's top authorities on BPA. The assessment was signed by 37 other leading experts on BPA.
These experts stated that BPA is capable of altering the normal functioning of genes, turning them on and off at inappropriate times. They believe exposure leads to changes in the prostate, testes, mammary glands, brain structure and behaviour of laboratory animals, and "is a great cause for concern with regards to the potential for similar adverse effects in humans"
In fact, the assessment panel warned that BPA may be linked to the contemporary increases in breast cancer, prostate cancer, Type 2 diabetes, early onset of puberty in girls, obesity, and neuro-behavioural problems such as attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders.
Manufacturers weigh in
The plastics industry as argued for years that the levels of BPA that leach into canned foods and bottled drinks are safe. Their Bisphenol website states: "BPA has been safely used in consumer products and researched and studied for over 40 years. The weight of scientific evidence clearly supports the safety of BPA and provides strong reassurances that there is no basis for human health concerns from exposure to BPA."
Consider the source
But in 2005, Frederick vom Saal published a paper showing that 100 percent of the industry-funded studies (11 in all) found no harmful effects from BPA, while 90 percent of government-funded low-dose studies (104 in all) found harmful effects from BPA. According to vom Saal, "Among people who have actually read this [scientific] literature, there is no debate, just an illusion of controversy. This is a phenomenally potent chemical."
Over-exposure the issue
Part of the problem is that so many products contain BPA (everything from the lining in all our canned good, plastic bottles, CDs to auto parts and computers) that virtually everybody in developed countries has chronic exposure to the chemical. According to the recent assessment, human exposures are above the U.S. safety level, a level based on 1980s toxicity studies that considered only high-dose exposures, not chronic low-dose exposure.
An interesting test
The Environmental Working Group contracted an analytical laboratory to test 97 cans purchased in three major supermarket chains throughout southern U.S. Foods tested were those most commonly consumed by women of child bearing years: soda, canned tuna, peaches, pineapples, green beans, corn, and tomato and chicken noodle soups along with canned infant formula. The lab detected BPA in fifty-seven percent of all cans.
Health agencies slow to act
In May 2007, regulators for Health Canada and Environment Canada are assessing BPA, a process that could take up to five years. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has asked the National Academies of Science to begin an updated assessment shortly on bisphenol A, which could take years.
Protect you and your family
In the meantime, there are steps that we can take immediately to lessen our exposure to BPA:
24 Comments
posted Nov 26, 2007 - 5:08 pm by alba
ARE THE PLASTIC BOTTLES OF INFANT FORMULA OK AND JUICE BOXES AND SIPPY CUPS
posted Nov 30, 2007 - 3:35 pm by G.B.
No, they aren't. See what it says, research it.
posted Jan 11, 2008 - 3:24 pm by betty
There are powdered infant formula and liquid infant formula are they both unsafe?
posted Jan 20, 2008 - 2:25 am by lou
how can i detect if a plastic cup is being reused rather than being disposed.you see.im on a research if the plastic cups in our school are being reused.what simple tests can i do that is can be done by a high school student.
posted Feb 5, 2008 - 8:28 am by Krista
I am responding to the sippy cup question - no they are not all safe, there is a great one called "Safe Sippy" and it is made of stainless steel and is BPA free as well. There is another one on the marker called "Kleen Kanteen" but the plastic in not BPA free as the spout is made by Avent and they do not manufacture BPA free products.
posted Feb 7, 2008 - 11:28 pm by Tina
Platex bottle liners, are they BPA free, the package does not say. Also, if canned liquid infant formula is not safe, is the powder formula in a can safe (Similac)?
Can we assume plastics labeled as #5 are BPA free?
posted Feb 20, 2008 - 6:58 am by Sylva Pate
Hi,I changed baby bottles from Avent to Born Free without BPA.
I am using Similac ready to use in white plastic bottle - it is not can. How can I tell that this bottle is BPA FREE ? On the bottom of plastic is number 2 in triangle not sure what is that mean.
posted Apr 10, 2008 - 3:06 am by Elisabeth
pineapple transparent plastic containers have number 7 underneath, is this polycarbonate or is this safe??
posted Apr 15, 2008 - 10:20 pm by MIke
So Those milk jug bags have BPA?The carton milk containers have no BPA?
posted Apr 17, 2008 - 1:57 am by Julie
I've done basically the same as Sylva said she is has done. I got rid of my Dr. Brown bottles and got the bornfree bottles. I also use Similac ready to feed formula (organic). Is it safe? It has a number 2 on the bottom and its not clear. I understand the metal seal has the bpa, but the formula hardly ever touches it. and its removed when you start using it, so when you shake the bottle its not there any more.....
posted Apr 17, 2008 - 12:26 pm by Lauren
I have been told any plastic containers with a "7" contain BPA as well as other toxins. I think the best way to be close to 100% certain on cutting out these chemicals is to eliminate plastics from our lives.
I have switched to using stainless steel nalgene bottles as well as a few other brands, I bought a large supply of water filter refills for my side tap filter and have also switched (as stupid as this sounds) my two birds' food and water dishes to stainless steel.
It's pretty scary what our world is coming to. We're trying to live yet we're getting ahead of ourselves and killing the human race. How hard is it to take a little bit of the past back and revert back to bottled milk, paper or cloth bags and fresh food?
posted Apr 17, 2008 - 5:42 pm by Daz
What about PET bottles and leeching?? these are single use only bottles, designed to be thrown away after 1st use, but people continue to refill and re use these bottles. You are more likely to be hit by a bus leaving the store where you bought your bottle than ill effects of BPA. get over it.
posted Apr 18, 2008 - 3:25 pm by Heather
Can anyone explain what all the different number symbols on plastics mean. I've heard that 7 has BPA, and that some of the numbers indicate if they can be recycled. Can anyone explain them in more detail?
posted Apr 18, 2008 - 4:31 pm by betty
you recommend glass-what about lead content for storage and heating?
posted Apr 18, 2008 - 6:02 pm by Lori
They say plastics with the number 3 and 7 are most likely to contain BPA and release the most amount. Type 2, 4, and 5 are believed to not release significant amounts of chemicals. Type 1 and 6 do not have BPA.
posted Apr 19, 2008 - 1:52 pm by Brenda
As a consumer, Im very concerned about this BPA scare thats going on. I just had a baby, we have been using drop ins for his bottles, but i use plastic bottles to store sanitized water, these plastic bottles have the #5 with the triangle around it..Is this safe to use? I also use Goodstart with omega 3 and 6 that is canned for his formula, is this safe?posted Apr 20, 2008 - 1:12 pm by Lisa
My concern is that all the glass "left over" containers still have plastic lids and the only ones I can find that specifically say non-leaching plastic lids are stainless steal so they can not be microwaved.... any suggestions!
posted Apr 21, 2008 - 12:42 am by Allison Ellis
Hello. I have a HUGE concern as well of the BPA concern that many Canadians are questioning right now. I have a daughter who is turning 1 this saturday; I have been using the Walt-Disney Winnie the Pooh bottles since her birth & now there is this scare! I am worried. The Wal-Mart in my area are clue-less on information that I am asking them to provide me. What do I do? Do I throw all my plastic bottles away & buy glass ones?....or is it too late because she has been is using them for so long/??? HELP!
posted Apr 22, 2008 - 8:29 am by yogi
Doe anyone know if the the Brita water filtering jugs contain BPA????
posted Apr 22, 2008 - 11:21 am by Concerned parent too
If we are talking about hard plastic, then what about plastic glasses that we give our kids to drink from, plastic patio glasses (that we use to avoid glass breakage outside or around pool decks) & what about the plastic juice jugs that we mix & store drinks in? How far does this "hard plastic" extend?
posted Apr 22, 2008 - 11:27 pm by N.H
This link breaks down all of the numbers. Lori has them a little bit mixed up. http://www.blogs.insidetoronto.com/naturopathic_perspectives/category/harmful-plastics/
posted Apr 23, 2008 - 8:25 pm by Steve
EVERYONE STOP FREAKING OUT, BPA IS NOT AS BAD AS IT SEEMS HOW LONG HAVE WE BEEN USING THESE PRODUCTS FOR? THINK ABOUT IT! THERE HAVE BEEN NO PROVEN STUDIES THAT BPA KILLS PEOPLE SO RELAX.
posted Apr 24, 2008 - 10:26 am by Genterprise
Tetra Brik and Combi-block cartons absorb Vitamin C. Lowering the C level in Juices. Vitamin C fights toxins, Vitamin C in a plastic container is already attacking Toxins (or it could become ascorbate). You need that Vitamin C in your body, not in the plastic container. Tetra Brik's use a polymer that has zinc in it. A good question for researchers is this. If the Vitamin C in a Tetra Brick is diminishing then where exactly does it go? If Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) in a Brick is converted to Ascorbate then there is no loss, it is actually a better form of vitamin C because it has a neutral pH. Packaging researchers need to work on this.
posted Apr 27, 2008 - 12:30 am by C.L
Check your 18.9 litre water bottles you might have at home. Cullagan bottles have the number 7 stamped on the bottem. Also my travel mug I just bought from Starbucks has a number 7 as well. Sick man
Add your comment







.gif)

