Powell River: A community fights back

  • email to a friend
  • print this page
  • Bookmark and Share

Powell River: A community fights back

When she describes her adopted hometown of Powell River, British Columbia, Patricia Aldworth calls it “paradise on earth.” Accessible only by ferry, this small city (population 13,500), located on the West Coast, remains a remote gem tucked between mountains.

Employer threatens town
The only blight on the pristine horizon is a pulp and paper mill operated by the Catalyst Paper Corporation. First opened in 1912, the mill was once touted as the largest in the world, though it has cut back significantly on production in recent years.

When Aldworth moved to Powell River two years ago from Victoria, she was intent on enjoying a relaxing retirement after a hectic life as a lawyer. Instead, thanks to that same paper mill, it’s been anything but. Aldworth, a member of the Powell River Legacy, is one of many residents fighting the Catalyst Paper mill as it seeks to re-open and expand a sealed off industrial waste dump. At one time the mill employed many of the residents but has now become the active threat on the quality of life.

Toxic mountains
Those opposed to the dump say there are a number of problems with the company’s plan. The landfill began as an illegal dumping ground for toxic waste in the 1950s, earning legitimate status in the 1970s before being capped in the 1990s. The capping was done to prevent water from moving toxins and materials from the unlined dump into nearby Powell Lake—though ironically, some people indicate that it was closed due to ground water contamination. Now, although the company insists the site is safe, opponents say it’s still leaking.

The bigger problem, says Aldworth, is that Catalyst now wants to expand a ‘mini-landfill’ which was opened on an adjacent site to the original dump. The mill’s waste (mostly a material called ‘fly-ash’, a powdery by-product of coal combustion) is currently being trucked to the landfill site, but it’s nearing capacity. It has applied to implement a vertical expansion of the site – a proposal that would see the dump extend upwards, nine and a half stories into the air. Adding insult to injury, the mini-landfill site is only 300 meters away from the residential community of Wildwood.


Company beliefs
The company insists that the plans for expansion are safe. Sarah Barkowski, manager of environment and quality systems for Catalyst, says there has been a tremendous amount of misinformation around the mill. “If I believed what other people believe, I’d be embarrassed to say I wasn’t at the protest rally,” she says, “but all the data says that there’s going to be very little impact to air quality and ground water.” Barkowski says that the site will be subject to thorough tests from the Ministry of the Environment, and will ultimately lead to the mill reducing their greenhouse emissions because they won’t need to truck their waste out of town by truck.

But Aldworth says she is suspicious about why the mill even feels it needs to expand the landfill. “Here’s the bottom line: there’s no way that this company needs the landfill they’re asking for with the minimal production that they’re doing at this mill. What’s really happening is that they’re planning to convert the mill into some sort of energy producing plant. Nobody is telling us this, but if you just put two and two together…”

Waiting for results
Those opposed to the mill’s landfill expansion are anxiously waiting for the result of the mill’s formal application. In the meantime, Aldworth says they’ll keep fighting. “I’d like to see the mill close,” she says, rattling off a list of other possible uses for the mill’s waterfront site that include arts centre, school and museum. “We should be cutting edge because we’re so isolated,” says Aldworth, “we should be a testing ground for communities functioning independently. We can’t be depending on the mill anymore,” she says, “because it’s clear they’re not going to provide for us.”

Meredith Dault is a freelance journalist and broadcaster based in Halifax, Nova Scotia.







Tags: community, energytag cloud.

10 Comments

posted Sep 6, 2007 - 7:45 pm by Kathy
don't let "paradise on earth." fall!!! =)))
there aren't many places like Powell River, British Columbia on Earth.
posted Oct 6, 2007 - 12:50 am by Ken
I would like to put some things straight in this article and the person writing this article should had made certain her statements were correct.

1) This landfill site has never closed, so it does not need to be re-opened, it has always been opened.

2)The Mill, is not a threat to the community, the present owners Catalyst is an active partner in many groups in Powell River, and donates thousands of dollars to many charitable organizations, such as museums, sports groups, and other smaller organizations.

3)The landfill was never an Illegal Dump, because if it was, it would have had to be cleaned up. The landfill fell under a federal regulation change and new guidelines in which the original landfill did not meet, but at no time was this landfill illegal.

4)The landfill examinations by various groups, including Green Peace type groups have never located any leaching of the site anywhere, since the land fill sits a few hundred feet above Powell Lake, leaching would become clearly visible through bedrock cracks or along natural waterflow ways.

5)Powell River Catalyst Division does not burn Coal,, so this articles claim that 'fly-ash' here is a by product of coal burning is false.
posted Feb 29, 2008 - 6:23 pm by Juliana
My husband would like to move with me and the three kids to Powell River. Where can we get accurate information about the health impact / pollution of this area.

Thank you so much, Juliana
posted Mar 4, 2008 - 7:19 pm by Rick
I'd like to clarify some points regarding Ken's comments above:

2) This is a red herring. Donating to charitable organizations does not somehow cancel out polluting the surrounding community. If the mill is introducing toxins into the surrounding environment, it can be a threat to the community. This is a typical industry practice of externalizing the costs of pollution onto people in the surrounding airshed and watershed.

4) This is untrue. Possible leachate has been seen as reported by David Harris at http://www.prlegacy.org/node/356. It needs to be tested by a neutral third party free of interference.

5) Fly ash does not come exclusively from coal. It is a byproduct of burning material for energy and/or disposal, coal being but one example. The relevant point is whether or not this fly ash is toxic. If it is, and given that the landfill is not lined, the logical conclusion is that it will eventually end up either in Powell Lake or Powell River, given the area's hydrology.

I think the point about converting the mill to energy production is a valid concern, given what Alcan has done in Kitimat. With the Campbell Liberals rigging the system to guarantee Independent Power Producers significant profits (see Power Play: The Theft of BC's Rivers at http://ashlu.info/video/bcrivers.html for details), it would be more lucrative for Catalyst to produce power instead of paper. If that is the plan, it is important to know what sort of generation system and fuel is envisioned. I doubt enough power can be generated from Powell River, given how short it is.

As for Juliana's question about getting accurate information about health, I would not trust any information furnished by Catalyst Paper or the BC Ministry of Environment or any studies commissioned/funded by either entity. That said, Powell River is not a Love Canal. You are exposed to more pollution living in Vancouver or Victoria. You should just make sure of where your drinking water comes from and that it isn't coming from the river.
posted Apr 18, 2008 - 8:46 pm by Tim
The real threat to Powell River is the invasion of wealthy out of town retirees from larger urban centres who feel the town exists only to provide them a cheap and pristine retirement centre. Not only do they drive up real estate prices but feel that no one has the right to make a living here. Instead of wanting to integrate into an existing community they want to remake it into their fantasy retirement home.
posted Aug 14, 2008 - 11:36 am by Nicole
The Ministry has approved the application.
We have less than a month left to appeal the decision. Appeals must be delivered in writing to:
Regional Manager, Environmental Protection, at Ministry of Environment, Regional Operations, Lower Mainland Region, 2nd Floor, 10470 - 152 Street, Surrey, BC V3R 0Y3.
This decision is incredible given the opposition, the scope and the unresolved issues presented by residents.
posted Aug 25, 2008 - 6:16 am by dan
I'm a youth living in powell river. I moved here from Vancouver and i have never seen the night sky in its entire beauty until now. theres a couple hundred visible stars at night in van, and living "out of town" here i can see what seems like thousands of twinkling stars out there.
It would be a devistating loss if the factory giant is allowed to pollute our air and fill it with smog. I would feel sorry for anyone who looses their job if the factory is closed, but in my opinion, if the majority of people in powell river are happy with clean air and beautiful skies than the voice of a few hundred fired employees isn't a legitimate point to consider not closing the factory.
Once again i'm sorry for anyone that lost/will lose their job, but the majority speaks against the "giant company" in this "small town".
~Dan
posted Sep 7, 2008 - 12:52 am by lee
I'd like to clarify some of Rick's comments:

2) The mill is not "introducing toxins". There are far more dioxins and furans produced by beach fires and wood-burning stoves.

4) David Harris? Mr. Harris provided some numbers that could not be accurate. Until I see the calculations of his mass balance (and I would dearly like to know how he could have possibly found some of the data required to calculate it) I am afraid I have to call foul. He also persists on relying on his own hand-written notes from a report that doesn't exist.
And by the way, what leachate?

Any effluent of any variety has been tested by a third-, fourth- and fifth-party. Are you not going to believe it until you get the results you want to see?

The only thing mill fly-ash is not allowed to be used for is organic gardening. It is within the parameters necessary to be used as fill in your back yard.... or non-organic gardening.

Catalyst's mill does not produce "smog", folks.

I really wish that certain folks would not resort to poor science to rabble-rouse.
posted Sep 20, 2008 - 12:45 am by paddy goggins
i have recently filed an appeal - of the (ministry of environment) directors decision to amend the catalyst wildwood landfill permit.

patricia aldworth and self decided to combine our appeals about 1 day before there could be submission deadline issues. patricia will argue the directors decision failed to consider the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms under one or more sections.

my arguments are several, and include the existing permit cannot be extended by amendment.

currently, the board has accepted several appeals from concerned residents.

there will be an open hearing in Powell River. the dates and venues will be published.

paddy goggins
posted Oct 14, 2008 - 10:25 pm by Brett
I did some research on Paddy Goggins, and what I located seems to fit into why Paddys is so againts the mill and its operations. Just so that the air is open and honest here, Paddy is also running to be Mayor of Powell River now, since his personal friend Patricia Aldworth ran as a councilor then just quit without giving a reason to the taxpayers of Powell River.
Paddy was a former employee of the local mill, and sadly he was injured, yet his arrogance and hatred for the mill got the better of him, he lost his job, he lost his income as well as appeals againts the mill, labour relations, wcb and I am sure others I could not locate. I find after reading all I have found about Paddy and Patricia, my opinion is that they both have a personal vendetta againts the mill.

I come armed with references for those reading this, although I am sure it will be certainly deleted here, I will most certainly post it elsewhere if it is, so my advise is to leave it here, untouched, and mostly unviewed by those in the Powell River area.

http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Vp69jFfM_AcJ:www.cep1123.bc.ca/Arbitrations/76WCBDenial.pdf+paddy+goggins&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=12

http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:LUXkARwC0tkJ:www.eab.gov.bc.ca/waste/2001was013a.pdf+%3C+paddy+goggins+%3E&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2

http://www.eab.gov.bc.ca/waste/97was10d.htm
Add your comment
Name
Email AddressURL (Optional)
Comment
Free Newsletter & Digital Magazine
Enter Your Email Address:
Digital Magazine:Get your free digital copy of Green Living Magazine in your inbox, four times a year.
Green Living Newsletter:Green tips & feature stories in your inbox, once a week.

ecochick is cool, Canadian and environmentally friendly. We feature the coolest green products we can find that you'll want to buy.
Visit ecochick.ca »

Tyler Hamilton blogs about trends, happenings and innovations in the clean technology market.
Visit cleanbreak.ca »

BikingToronto is the best place for Toronto cycling information — it's a positive outlook on all cycling-related events and news in Toronto
Visit bikingtoronto.com »